Target-state and gap assessment
Review logical architecture, segmentation, identity trust paths, service dependencies and the controls that protect important workloads.
SECURITY ARCHITECTURE
Design security around trust boundaries, not products.
Create coherent security architecture across identity, network, endpoint, cloud and data controls without allowing individual tools to dictate the target state.
Architecture that can be executed
01
02
03
04
Deliverables aligned with implementation
Zero Trust design
Define identity-centric access, least privilege, conditional access, verification points and practical segmentation based on the environment.
Identity and privileged access
Assess IAM, IGA and PAM design, lifecycle controls, privileged workflows, authentication and account governance.
Cloud and hybrid patterns
Review cloud landing zones, network boundaries, workload protections, secure connectivity and configuration baselines.
Architecture that can be executed
01
02
03
From current state to validated design
Discover the estate
Map critical workloads, flows, trust boundaries and operational dependencies.
Design the control model
Agree on architecture principles, prioritized changes and measurable acceptance criteria.
Guide implementation
Review engineering changes and validate that new controls work as intended.
FAQ
Common architecture questions
Is Zero Trust a product that we need to buy?
No. Zero Trust is an architectural approach. Appropriate controls depend on the identity, network, device and application context you already have.
Can the engagement be limited to Microsoft 365, cloud or PAM?
Yes. A focused architecture review can target a domain while retaining the broader enterprise risk and dependency context.
Related advisory areas
← All capabilitiesSECURITY ARCHITECTURE
info@fornostsecurity.com
Review your security architecture
Share the architecture decision, integration or control gap you need to solve.